Business Link is changing

by Carl on October 13, 2011

Throughout 2011 I have been attending Vince Cable’s Entrepreneurs Forum’ to help advise the government on business and enterprise policies.

One of the areas we have focussed on specifically is developing a comprehensive start-up package to help fledgling businesses. We felt it was important to create an environment that helps businesses start, improve and grow.

I am pleased to say that many of our comments have helped shape the Business Improvement Programme and that the Government is now changing the way it provides information and advice to people who want to start and grow their business.

These changes include:

  • The Business Link website being updated in November 2011 with new, easy-to-use services to help people start, improve and grow their businesses
  • More accessible business mentors through mentorsme.co.uk.
  • Targeted business coaching for small businesses with high growth potential.

What do these changes actually mean?

Business Link

Business Link is changing not closing. From 25 November 2011, new services will be available online via the Business Link website: www.businesslink.gov.uk when the regional advisory services close.

The new website – www.businesslink.gov.uk– will be the first place to go to access essential information, support and services for your business.

You will be able to access all the necessary government services such as paying your VAT, PAYE or registering a business with Companies House.

By registering online, you can get information and regular updates tailored to the specific needs of your business and industry

I was fortunate enough to attend another sub-committee meeting which focuessed on the Governments desire to open up public sector contracts to many more SMEs.  You can search for public sector procurement opportunities using www.businesslink.gov.uk/contractsfinder

There’s also a wealth of information and guidance available on regulations which affect your business to ensure you can manage your business risks and stay the right side of the line

From November 2011, the Business Link website will be updated to provide easy-to-use information to help you start up, improve or grow your business.  New features will include:

  • A new growth and improvement service giving you access to the information you need to make your business work better; including tools to help you diagnose and solve business problems, a business support finder, tutorials and video case studies, information on events in your area and links to business discussions and other services.
  • If you are looking to start a business, or know someone who is, a whole new area of the Business Link website will provide a comprehensive start up service including online training and a starting up task list to guide people through the process.

To find out more and keep up-to-date with important business information such as changes to regulations, you can register with the Business Link website and sign up to their e-newsletter at www.businesslink.gov.uk/mybusiness

Mentorsme.co.uk

Businesses that do well often have outside help from a mentor so if you think you could benefit from talking to someone with a lot of business experience you can find a business mentor at www.mentorsme.co.uk

Mentorsme.co.uk will put you in touch with mentoring organisations across the UK who can help you find the kind of mentor that suits you, plus there’s lots of advice on what to look for in a good mentor.

If you would like to be a mentor and share your wealth of experience with a less experienced business person, the mentoring portal can help you find an organisation which can help.

Why have the services changed?


This is what the government has to say:

  • More and more businesses save time and money using online services to find the information and guidance they need to run their businesses
  • We know that businesses who take advice do better, so we are transforming the information and advice available online to make it easier for you to find what you need quickly and from sources you can trust
  • This is also the most effective and efficient way for us to provide the information and advice you need
  • Businesses have also told us that they most value support and advice from other businesses so we’ve built features into our new services to enable you to find this quickly and effectively
  • We’re focussing our support on helping businesses to start up, improve and grow because it’s UK businesses that will drive our economic recovery

Be sure to visit the new www.businesslink.gov.uk from November 25 and let me know your thoughts.

Carl

{ 0 comments }

Introduced as a ‘Back to Basics’ episode, this week’s task really did strip away any glitz, glamour and bullshit of business along with any hiding places for our ambitious ‘apprenti’ (what is a good collective noun for them? A ‘hopeless’ of apprentices? Perhaps a ‘shower’ of apprentices…)

Our ‘shower’ rose early again to be briefed by Lord Alan of Sales.  Never has the Lord’s ‘Del Boyness’ been so apparent in what you felt was his favourite place in the world – not his boat, airplane, apartments – but a wholesale warehouse. To him it wasn’t a drafty old shed full of tat, it was the final scene of raiders of the last ark and Lord Alan was Indiana.
 
This week he certainly did take it back to basics and made it clear that here was £200 worth of ‘gear’; sell it, see what sells best then quickly come back and buy more, then sell that too. After two days you’re done and don’t worry about the remaining stock, it’s an asset. Got that? There were maybe three to four people in the whole country who didn’t understand that; sadly they were stood in that wholesale warehouse nodding at Lord Alan.

So after inspecting their pallet of booty, which included everything from nodding dogs to sponges, all waiting for the profit to be squeezed (Lord Alan’s line not mine), the teams hit the streets.

This week Venture was almost lead by Susan who volunteered but found herself overruled… again. She was the Clegg of the team to Natasha’s Cameron while Jim bridged the gap Cable-like (don’t know why I went all ‘coalition’ then).

So off they headed toward the tourist trap that is Covent Garden to arrest the attention of ‘Johnny-foreigner’ long enough to part him from his cash. Who could resist a clear umbrella on a dry day or a nodding National Front puppy? Well, I could for a start but Jedi-Jim did his mind tricks again and the dogs pretty much flew of the shelf (okay, perhaps they didn’t quite fly).

However, while Jim was convincing people their lives would be enriched with a nodding dog, or that they needed an umbrella on a dry day, Susan’s strategy was proving less successful.

Let’s try selling a dodgy duvet, door to door, in one of the most expensive neighbourhoods in the country, sorry Europe…possibly the fekkin’ world. She couldn’t have got a more negative response if she had set fire to the damn things and pushed them through the letterbox; ‘take that you rich bastard’. But her summation of the strange strategy was that it only failed because it was a ‘rubbish product’.

Yes, that’ll be the issue Susan, dream on… (which she actually did as she proceeded to fall asleep in the comfort of her lovely people carrier). She should have got one of the duvets out.

Natasha, the team leader, was anything but as she kept herself busy doing those important things that add real value when you’re under pressure such as winding up team members, not listening to them, being condescending and ignoring feedback. Busy busy busy.  I’m not sure Jedi-Jim could been any clearer in saying to her “it’s all about re-investing” and his devious mind tricks didn’t work on her either.

At the market, alongside Susan who had decided that bracelets were the way to go, Natasha was simply the ‘Bitch on the Pitch’ and did nothing of any real consequence.

How did the other team fare? Well, Logic were anything but logical quite simply (which is what most of them are – simple). The girls – Helen and Melody – decided that their strategy was to sell to retailers , not to the higher margin public, but to retailers who buy from wholesalers anyway…hello, anyone there?

So the team, headed by ‘Melody-I-have-no-relevant-experience-but-I want-to-impress’, included ‘Helen-I-have-never-lost’ and ‘Tom-now-that-it’s-all-gone-wrong-let-me-tell-you-why’, headed out to fulfil their destiny.

It got off to a bad start when, after offering a box of £50 watches for £25, the retailer of the pound, yes POUND shop, declined. Time to go, I think so.

But just as the disastrous strategy seemed to be self-fulfilling, they were thrown a line. A retailer would indeed buy 10 towel sets off them… creating nearly £30 of profit. Excuse me if I don’t get giddy.

While the girls were stalking the retailers, Tom was well out of his comfort zone and with all the grace of the Child Catcher, he was aiming to sell nodding dogs to passing children. But credit to him as he managed it.

Again the dogs were proving popular, albeit at a lower price than the other team were selling them for. So like a good salesman and someone who understood the brief he called the team leader to order more dogs. It should therefore have come as no surprise that, ready for action the next day, Melody had bought…alarm clocks and phone chargers. Proving yet again that like the dogs in question, she may look at you and nod, but she ain’t listening.

Her lack of strategy became apparent and as the second day dawned, Helen attempted a coup de grace to overthrow Melody – which Melody wisely declined and pressed on.
Bless them, they all tried to sell their tat; the kind of electrical items you get for free when you buy ink cartridges for the office. And they did have some success. Convinced that the killer deal was to be had with the towels, Helen got the okay to consume £100 in fuel and four hours in time to make a potential £30 profit… Yes, let’s gloss over that. She was disappointed when she not only discovered that the original wholesaler was shut, but that the retailer she wanted to sell the towels to was also shut. Bad end to a bad day.

An ending that wasn’t that dissimilar to Natasha’s team’s: Jim , having finally convinced Natasha to allow him to buy more brollies, went off to re-invest a miserable £23 in 23 more brollies. And with 23 minutes to sell them, he didn’t succeed, funnily enough.

This lack of re-investment came back to haunt them all in the boardroom. As the teams sat there, neither one volunteering supportive comments about their team leaders, it seemed that only the boys had ‘got’ the aim of the task – the ‘back-the-winners’ strategy and invest more in the top sellers. So both boys, in the final analysis, were free to return to the house.

The team that actually won the task was Venture, mainly thanks to Jim’s sales technique of Irish charm combined with the right location in a market with the right products – dogs and brollies.

But so enraged was the Lord with their lack of understanding of the brief and their lack of desire to reinvest that he fined them £100. Luckily for them, their sales were still high enough to carry them over the line as winners – hurrah, but no treats were offered – booo.

So, in the losing team, Melody and Helen went head-to-head as owners of a duff sales strategy while Tom tried to keep quiet.  Helen had to ‘fess up’ over her would-be mutiny but made the mistake of saying she would also have carried on with the failed strategy of selling to retailers – but on a larger scale!

It was evident that Melody hadn’t listened to Tom’s advice – ‘more dogs’ he had yelped, let’s replenish what sells. But she hadn’t (did he yelp when he should have barked and howled?) Everyone was also aware of the ‘fool’s errand’ that Helen had embarked upon for a potential meagre profit.

Lord Sugar quizzed them all and they fought desperately: ‘Tom, you’ve been here before’, was the accusation. ‘Yes, but I did well in something I know I’m not good at’, was his response. Good enough this week to let him off.

‘Helen, it was an awful strategy, plus you’ve never started a business, you’re a jumped up PA.’  Her reply: ‘Yes, but I have won more times than anyone else and have pulled in record orders, this is my first mistake.’

‘Melody, you talk a lot but what do you actually do?’ Her response, of course included plenty of what we have heard before – her training by Al Gore, her claim to have worked with the Dalai Lama, featuring in the Queen’s Speech, her youthful age, her global business, yah-da, yah-da, yah-da… pass me a brolly Jim, it’s raining bullshit.

But this time Melody failed to strike a chord or hit the right note and it fell on deaf ears; Lord Alan let her go – and rightly so in my opinion.

So what did we learn from this week?
 
Well, first of all, never underestimate the poor taste of the general public, especially those who may be visiting our fair, if drizzly land, on a holiday.
 
Listen to the brief you have been given and don’t go off piste and develop your own strategies when it’s been laid out for you by an expert – you are there to learn.
 
If you’re selling, it pays to cut out the middle man. Get your products to end users for the highest returns.

Don’t try to sell a million items if your customers only want ten items, remember that 80% of your profit probably comes from 20% of your range.
 
Find the winners and back them and if they sell, guess what? BUY MORE!

And always, always remember to TEST – your product, your message, your channel, your service. Then MEASURE – the responses, the sales, the enquiry, the footfall – and ROLL OUT with the winners.

But hey, they’re all winners really… well all apart from the eejit losers.

This article was first written for and published on Business Matters

{ 0 comments }

So, just the not-so-magnificent seven remain.

I hereby solemnly swear, that in the following piece, I will not to use any obvious and lame biscuit or confectionary related puns or wordplay. I will leave that to the tweeters.

I was a little uninspired by the evening’s adventure into the world of biscuits. Perhaps it’s my detox which means, that not only have I lost them from my diet, but I have also lost my lifelong love of the small, sugary, crispy offerings that I consumed so many of during the dullest of meetings.

However, the teams seemed up for their biscuit challenge. Again, another tough task of not only creating a brand new product and testing it, but also manufacturing and packaging it, branding and selling it – hold on a minute haven’t we seen all this before? I guess that’s the strength and the weakness of the show’s format. They will always end up producing or selling as Lord Sugar (if that was an ingredient list he would be slightly more Lordly than Sugary) isn’t looking for a manager of people. So, in the early hours, off the ‘Apprenti’ went to Swansea to develop their ideas.

On hearing the brief Zoe’s face lit up – never a good sign, as every ‘expert’ seems to fail when given their specialism in the task.

The ‘ingredients’ of each team were again mixed up, which resulted in Venture being lead by the invulnerable Helen who stayed at biscuit HQ with Natasha while they sent Jedi-Jim packing off to Swansea to be the Mr Kipling of the team.

In team logic, Zoe became manager as it was her ‘specialism’ but not until she had slapped down the yapping puppy that is Susie – to steal a phrase from Nick. As well as Susie, Zoe had ‘listen to me-listen to me Melody’, and Prof Tom in her team. Wanting to keep as far away as possible from the troublesome Melody, Zoe dispatched her and Tom to darkest Swansea to play at Willy Wonka.

Now that we are down to just seven candidates, the strength of their personalities is starting to show and their ability to annoy only heightens.

Their little idiosyncrasies and character traits are starting to bug me – am I getting too involved? From Tom’s blinky-eyed Mr Bean gormlessness, to Zoe’s voice which sounds like a creaking door to Natasha who looks ready for a fight or Melody who could start an argument in an empty room, they’re starting to grind, and not just with me but each other.

Their strategies are becoming clearer with each task and with each element of the task – from idea, development and sales through to the board room fights – it’s getting personal!

But back to the biscuits.

What were the solutions? Venture’s Jim was coming up with ideas and names again and pretty much developed a whole flapjack, star-shaped biscuit on his own – very Kipling-esque.

He did his kiddie’s research and listened to what they had to say then relayed that back to base and the decision was made: ‘Special Stars’ as a treat for kids after school… which you can have anytime…so it became ‘anytime is treat time’.

A brand positioning that contradicts itself which they failed to pick up on but one which everyone else mentioned – but let’s gloss over that for now.

Meanwhile, in team Logic, Tom and Melody came up with three or four ideas.  Tom’s ‘emergency biscuit’ (for diabetics perhaps?) wasn’t well received but he took it on the chin and presented his second idea, a biscuit which was two biscuits in one – with one half chocolate and the other half not chocolate – The ‘Bix Mix’ as they called it, aimed at schizophrenics perhaps or the terminally indecisive?

Having said that, my wife did say ‘ooh I could just eat one of those’ but she is a vegetarian so we shouldn’t take any notice of her dietary demands. Melody’s idea of creating a ‘new popcorn’ which was bits of biscuits with marshmallows was soundly rejected but she made the point that they were all wrong and she was right.

So with the biscuits designed and made, names were decided upon, packaging designed and off they went to pitch to three of the biggest supermarket chains in the country.

Helen and Jim took the lead on their pitches and fended off concerns over the sweetness of the product and over the possible negative health issues with the brave claim that if the parents want the kids to have something healthy, they can give them a banana – simples.

Helen, between pitches, asked Natasha  to not ‘butt in’ if there was no need, so for the rest of the pitches Natasha said nothing – way to go managing your team Helen. And into the limelight stepped Jim. I have heard some bullshit in my time in pitches and he did ‘take the ……’ I won’t say it.
But it was a strongly executed piece of work and with Helen’s track record, could she win this one too?

On the other team, Melody insisted they kick off their pitches with an unannounced role play, at which point I had my head in my hands pleading that someone stop them. No-one did unfortunately and something that had a similar dramatic quality to your local primary school’s nativity play took place in front of these three very important buying teams – dreadful, truly dreadful.

It did though throw up an issue that we have seen before and one which created an argument between Zoe and Melody; the question of who was target audience? As it was said, if they themselves didn’t know, then why would the retailers? Audience is joint most important factor along with your offer – I know I’ve said it before but then this type of ‘task’ has also been on before.

It turned out no one actually liked Zoe’s team’s product, the biscuit itself, but everyone loved the packaging and brand. Sadly though, ‘creative’ only accounts for 20% of your success after knowing your audience and having a good offer, or in this case a good biscuit!

So, with the pitches done they returned to the boardroom to hear the results, the cracks and alliances in the teams showing. Helen seemed to feel confident in herself but had marked Natasha’s card just in case while Zoe and Melody might has well have just taken it on the street there and then and gone for it – let battle commence.

The result was another annihilation as Helen’s team generated an exclusive ASDA sale of 800,000 units of the rich and sickly treat that’s not a treat – the star biscuits. The result even drew a ‘bloody hell’ from the lips of Lord Sugary while Zoe’s team sold…none. Confused audience and poor offer – but hey, it looked pretty!

So, who returned to fight for their survival? Easy choices really as Susie hadn’t done much wrong so after a squint at Tom that would have done Nick proud, she was free to go. That left a trio* to return.

Tom’s only defence for being a bit of a willy-wonka was that he didn’t know he was designing a premium product. Melody’s defence…well let’s be honest, she didn’t have one. She is simply dreadful and her ‘I don’t listen to anyone until they agree with me’ tactic is wearing thin.

Tom, with his feeble defence, was again pulled up on his perfect 20/20 hindsight as a way of avoiding any personal responsibility or liability – he very nearly became a member of the ex-apprentice club*.

Zoe’s defence, as team leader, was that the product let them down. But she was the boss and she should have been there as it was developed – her expertise meaning she had a responsibility to get the product right – at least in lord Sugary’s eyes. And her failure to do so was so heinous a crime that the dark Lord had to flex his muscles and let Zoe and p-p-p-p-pick up* a…cab.

And what did we learn this week?

Well, Lord Sugar’s comment to Zoe of ‘you’re the expert and you didn’t perform in your field’, did echo with some advice I had offered an employer that very day in Northern Ireland when talking about his teams.

To be effective and to be of value, your employees need to be aware of many things but three main areas to consider are their ‘expertise’ in their own discipline, in the business sector and in the business itself. I would suggest that Zoe tonight didn’t put a tick against any of those requirements.

She couldn’t know ‘the business’ as there isn’t really a business – it’s a two day task. But she claimed to be an expert in creating, producing and branding a FMCG, and to having knowledge, almost expert knowledge, of the sector – high street supermarkets, “I pitch to these people all the time”. But on this occasion she didn’t fulfil any one of my suggested requirements, never mind the two she claimed.

My advice would be to look at your staff, especially the ‘problem’ ones, and ask, are they really good at what they do? Do they really understand the sector you operate in? And do they really understand how your business functions, its goals and ambitions and how it generates profits? If they don’t tick either of those boxes then it’s time to stop what you are doing and have a break*, have a quick-chat.
*okay, so that’s a biscuit/pun/reference

The article was first written for and published on Business Matters

{ 0 comments }

They started as 16 and now only 8 remain; the entrepreneurial elite. Wasn’t it George Bush Jnr who said the French have no word for entrepreneur? And he was the most powerful man in the world so there’s hope yet for all of these candidates.

This week, the ‘Apprenti’ threatened to end the entente cordiale that has been in place for over 100 years with a 48 hour business excursion to Paris. They were tasked with choosing an array of UK designed goods and headed through the Euro Tunnel to sell the ideas and products of this great nation’s designers.

Among the things they were able to choose from were edible cress postcards, an electric bike, a bean bag bed, a tea pot light and a kiddie’s booster seat-come-backpack. Each item caused Susie to ‘go beyond stupid’ in her questioning of the French consumer, psyche, culture…in fact, the whole nation.  “Do they like camping? Do they drive cars? Do they like children?” she queried. Do they breath oxygen, do they walk upright, do they have opposable thumbs? The list could have gone on.

Although I liked a comment made by both teams, ‘I like the product, but I really like the margins!’, I disliked the naivety and blinkered vision that came across from not just Susie, but a couple of the others. It did nothing to enhance either the image of Londoners being somewhat insular and ‘universe-centric’, especially with Melody’s comment; “it’s not a car boot sale, we’re not up north’. In fact, it did nothing to convince anyone watching that we are truly nothing more than an island race with delusions of adequacy at times.

But let’s pretend for a moment we are in fact Europhiles and under the instruction of Lord Alain d’Sucre, the teams made their choices. Now let’s stop and review how they made these choices.

I think everyone could see that the kiddie seat was a winner. There are lots of kids, lots of cars and legally they have to be in a booster seat – and this one has another use and can move with the kid from car to car while serving as a funky back pack – put reins on it and it’s every parents’ ‘must-have accessory’ (can you tell I have two under two?)

But despite Tom’s first choice, as team leader of Logic and with his baby sector experience, being said seat, he lost the plot and caved in to the rather biased ‘market research’ carried out by the overpowering Melody.  On arrival at a TRAIN STATION in France she failed to find anyone who drove cars around Paris – funny that. The next day, however, while stuck in the world famous traffic congestion of Paris she was heard to utter the words “where did all these cars come from?” Doh!

Her subterranean, Metro based research was driven by some rather leading questioning as well as some very woolly, selectively interpreted answers that suited her own gut feeling that she didn’t like a product she had never seen and wasn’t target market for – genius.

Tom’s team also included an unusually quiet Natalie and the always-charming-but-a-bit-goofy Leon. Together they invaded Paris with all the hope of the Dunkirk landings to sell their ‘classic’ teapot lights and edible cress postcards, and equipped with his Del Boy guide to speaking French, Tom did his best.

Venture’s ‘beyond stupid’ team leader Susie managed to capture the kiddie seat and a bendy universal gripper for cameras, mobile phones and MP3 players – a sexy little ‘must have’ (the gripper, not Susie).
Both teams had a day to hit the appointments they’d managed to make the day before as well as ad-hoc opportunities they spotted while running around the city. They also has the BIG appointment Lord Alain had set up for them with La Redoute… doesn’t everyone know them? I certainly do as I worked on their account in my past life on customer acquisition and retention campaigns.  THEY ARE HUGE.

Although both teams made some sales at some of their sourced buyers and independent retailers, the events of that particular part of the task were mainly that Melody arranged the meetings for Logic, yet wanted to keep them all to herself – team game Melody, or is it? Whereas Jim, on team Venture, arranged the appointments then shared them out.

Tom, as team leader, was a victim of sleight of hand, losing his preferred product to Melody’s ‘research’ and he also let her bully him out of the team’s appointments. In the sales opportunities Susie actually shone at moments but the chaps in both teams – Tom, James and Leon – did very poorly. Leon, as we now know, cannot speak French – ironic considering he has a French name.

On approaching the La Redoute meeting set up by Lord Alain we discovered, not surprisingly, that Tom’s team did no research whatsoever over the potential buyers and it showed – they offered them 10 tea pots, a storm in a tea cup to someone the size of La Redoute.

And the decision on who was to pitch to this ‘unknown retailer’ was made by the classically accepted, business decision-making process known in the playground as ‘Scissors, Paper Stone’. Or as they say in France “Zut alors, you’re having a laugh”. To make matters worse, only later did we learn that Leon had actually worked for La Redoute in their call centres but it ‘slipped his mind’. Perhaps he had simply lost his mind!

Susie’s team, however, did have the not-so-secret-weapon of Helen whose pitch to La Redoute was perfect. She shone where Tom’s team failed. And unlike Tom’s pathetic efforts, Super Helen talked to the buyers as not only a customer of theirs, but also as someone who understood their audience and how to position the product, not to mention how well suited it was to the La Redoute product range.  To be fair, I think you could have simply drop-kicked the kiddie chair into the room of buyers and they would have seen that it was a winner but Helen did a hell of a job.

The end result of the team’s effort led to not so much a victory, but more an annihilation of Tom’s team who sold 11,705 Euros worth to the independents and unsurprisingly, nothing to La Redoute.

Susie’s team on the other hand, gained an order worth 214000 Euros from La Redoute thanks to Helen alone and also beat the other team on their independent sales.

The real winner of the show? The manufacturer of the kiddie seat – I will be getting one delivered very soon no doubt, now that Mrs H has seen it.

So, just the recriminations and back-stabbing to take place now and back in the boardroom Tom, Melody and Leon came face-to-face with Lord Alain’s wrath. Yes, okay I know Melody was a lying, conniving, talkative, patronising, bull-dozing cow (can you be a bull and a cow?) throughout the task, but she can sell and her performance and style were only exaggerated by Natalie’s ‘say nothing’ tactics combined with the very poor performance and leadership shown by Leon and Tom respectively.

Personally, I think Tom should have left Melody outside as it was obvious she was up for a fight and had appointments and sales to back her up whereas Natalie did nothing. He didn’t need to worry though as Lord Sugar went with his gut feeling and kept Tom in the race. Leon, however, was totally ineffectual and like Bonny Tyler, he was Lost In France. It made it an easy decision for Lord Sugar to montré him la porte.

So what did we learn?
Well, once again as in past episodes, we learnt that you should be very careful how you conduct your market research. Ask lots of people and ask them balanced questions. Then LISTEN to their answers.

It’s also okay to admit that you are not target audience and that this doesn’t make it a bad product. I have an investment in body-building supplements but I’m not a body builder (hard to believe, I know, I’m just blessed with this physique).

We perhaps also learnt that to really commit to something you should go with your gut instinct – as Tom should have done with the kiddie car seat.

We saw that English is still pretty much the business language of the world, possibly reluctantly and not for long and although it’s great to have a language (or six Melody), under your belt, you can still get away with just English.

Again, the task demonstrated that when launching your business, it seems nothing beats face-to-face sales – would-be buyers want to see and feel the product in their hands and alongside their other items.

It also showed me what great products are still being designed and produced in the UK and that is where we should focus our future on. We all want to see manufacturing rise again if we can ever truly compete. But let’s not ignore the fact that we nurture great design in this country across such a wide spectrum – from fashion and product design to architecture and mechanical design.

And, last but not least, surely it demonstrated the need to think outside of this sceptre isle, this other Eden, this little world, this precious stone set in the silver sea, this blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England…. you get the idea – GO GLOBAL people.

This post was first written for and published on Business Matters.

{ 0 comments }

My take on The Apprentice, episode 7 – The Magazine task

23 June 2011

So only nine remain and this week their early morning began huddled in the foyer of the headquarters of one of Rupert Murdoch’s old newspapers, before he created the global TV network with Sky TV. But who this week would be lost at sea and thrown overboard by the captain of industry, Lord Alan -Pugwash [...]

Read the full article →

Carl Hopkins: my 60 seconds on Four Rooms, Channel 4′s new series

21 June 2011

It started with a tweet. An industry chum, Phil Dean, tweeted about a blog post he’d written about comics. Superhero comics, you know the sort; Marvel and DC, Spiderman and Batman. He is a fan and so I tweeted back that I was too. He came to my home and we spent a couple of hours chatting [...]

Read the full article →

My take on The Apprentice, episode 5 – The Pet Food advertising task

13 June 2011

It’s 9pm. You get your preferred beverage and your smart phone on twitter and away you go. It’s the aspiration of would-be entrepreneurs, an anathema to serious business people, simple, light entertainment to those with a job, and a tenuous claim to fame of all those now ‘business gurus’ who were once fired from the [...]

Read the full article →

Is The Apprentice good for business?

10 June 2011

We have all tuned is as the ‘tum te tum te tum tem tum’ music strikes up. The hopefuls in their designer suits pulling their little cases behind them, strolling confidently through, over and past a variety of well known landmarks in our capital. All out to impress the dark Lord; Alan of Amstrad. It’s [...]

Read the full article →

If it’s free, does it have value?

10 June 2011

I was recently fortunate enough to be asked to join a panel of experts to debate the role of LEP’s. While on stage, the discussion touched upon the demise of Business Link and the plans to centralise this business support service as well as introduce 40,000 free business mentors. It was reported, or rather tweeted, [...]

Read the full article →

Have you seen C4′s Four Rooms yet? It’s all about negotiation.

24 May 2011

A new show has hit Channel 4 primetime: ‘Four Rooms’.  A formulaic show, (but aren’t they all) which takes elements of Dragons’ Den, Antiques Roadshow and Cash in the Attic and smashes them together to give us a very slick looking ‘deal or no deal’ approach to unique items and collections. At a mystery location [...]

Read the full article →